
June 4, 2925
Apollo VS Zoom Info
If you're building B2B lead lists using Apollo or ZoomInfo directly, you're stuck in 2017.
Yes, both are household names — but the game has changed.
In this post, we’ll break down:
ZoomInfo vs Apollo: honest breakdown
Why Scrapeamax isn’t just different — it's smarter
The #1 reason your current data is saturated and what to do instead
ZoomInfo vs Apollo: The Classic Showdown
Feature | ZoomInfo | Apollo.io |
---|---|---|
Best For | Enterprises with deep pockets and US-based targets | Startups & SMEs needing prospecting and sequencing |
Pricing | Long contracts, credit-based, $$$ add-ons | Cheaper, monthly plans, but limited export/mobile credits |
Integrations | Strong (Salesforce, Hubspot, Salesloft, Outreach, etc.) | Moderate (Zapier, basic CRM + sequencing tools) |
Compliance | CCPA + GDPR + DNC checks (some countries) | CCPA + partial GDPR + limited DNC checks |
Intent Data | Bidstream-based buying signals | LeadSift-based crawling intent |
Browser Extension | Chrome plugin + integrations | LinkedIn, Gmail, Salesforce plugin |
Data Quantity | 220M contacts / 50M phones / 150M emails | 265M contacts / 120M phones / 165M emails |
Data Ownership | Retains data you submit via platform | Grants Apollo irrevocable rights to use your CRM data |
Verdict? ZoomInfo is heavier, Apollo is more flexible. But both rely on overused databases.
The Problem: Saturated Data = Dying Outreach
Everyone scrapes inside the same platforms. Same filters. Same ICPs. Same leads.
So it’s no surprise your open rates are dropping, your reply rates are falling, and every SDR is targeting the same 30k SaaS companies from Apollo or ZoomInfo.
The Scrapeamax Shift: Companies First, People Second
Here’s the smarter, more accurate, and way less saturated approach we use with Scrapeamax:
1. Scrape Companies Externally
Instead of filtering inside Apollo/Clay, we use top-level data sources:
Google Maps (for local)
BuiltWith (for tech stack filtering)
Clutch (for service companies)
Store Leads (for ecommerce)
Latka, AgencyVista, GoodFirms, etc.
You get companies nobody else is seeing.
2. Feed External Companies Into Apollo or Clay
Once we have clean company lists, we push them into:
Apollo to find work emails & contacts
Clay to enrich, filter, personalize
Why this works:
Apollo/Clay searches based on YOUR company list — not their own filters
You're getting people working in fresh, externally sourced companies
This bypasses saturation and hits way higher accuracy
Apollo and ZoomInfo Can’t Do This Alone
Here’s why:
Their filtering is locked inside their platform logic
You’re always pulling from the same pool as everyone else
You don’t own or control how company data is selected
With Scrapeamax:
You control the input (company source)
You use Clay/Apollo to enrich and contact — not to search
It’s outbound in reverse. And it works like hell.
Scrapeamax: The Bridge Between Raw Data and Scalable Outreach
Scrapeamax is not a contact finder. It’s a company scraping engine that fuels any enrichment tool you already use (Apollo, Clay, Smartlead, etc.).
Get hyper-specific companies
Scrape based on keywords, tech, niche, location
Push into Clay for outreach sequences or Apollo for contact scraping
All with zero saturation and 100% control.
TL;DR: Build Smarter Lists in 2025
❌ Don’t filter leads inside Apollo/ZoomInfo — they’re overused.
✅ Scrape company-level data externally first.
✅ Use Clay/Apollo to find contacts at those companies.
✅ Use Scrapeamax to feed this entire workflow.
This is how cold emailers in 2025 win — with better inputs, not louder outputs.
👉 Try Scrapeamax and build better lead lists today.