June 4, 2925

Apollo VS Zoom Info

Apollo vs ZoomInfo Which is better for lead list in 2025?

Apollo vs ZoomInfo Which is better for lead list in 2025?

If you're building B2B lead lists using Apollo or ZoomInfo directly, you're stuck in 2017.

Yes, both are household names — but the game has changed.

In this post, we’ll break down:

  • ZoomInfo vs Apollo: honest breakdown

  • Why Scrapeamax isn’t just different — it's smarter

  • The #1 reason your current data is saturated and what to do instead

ZoomInfo vs Apollo: The Classic Showdown

Feature

ZoomInfo

Apollo.io

Best For

Enterprises with deep pockets and US-based targets

Startups & SMEs needing prospecting and sequencing

Pricing

Long contracts, credit-based, $$$ add-ons

Cheaper, monthly plans, but limited export/mobile credits

Integrations

Strong (Salesforce, Hubspot, Salesloft, Outreach, etc.)

Moderate (Zapier, basic CRM + sequencing tools)

Compliance

CCPA + GDPR + DNC checks (some countries)

CCPA + partial GDPR + limited DNC checks

Intent Data

Bidstream-based buying signals

LeadSift-based crawling intent

Browser Extension

Chrome plugin + integrations

LinkedIn, Gmail, Salesforce plugin

Data Quantity

220M contacts / 50M phones / 150M emails

265M contacts / 120M phones / 165M emails

Data Ownership

Retains data you submit via platform

Grants Apollo irrevocable rights to use your CRM data

Verdict? ZoomInfo is heavier, Apollo is more flexible. But both rely on overused databases.

The Problem: Saturated Data = Dying Outreach

Everyone scrapes inside the same platforms. Same filters. Same ICPs. Same leads.

So it’s no surprise your open rates are dropping, your reply rates are falling, and every SDR is targeting the same 30k SaaS companies from Apollo or ZoomInfo.

The Scrapeamax Shift: Companies First, People Second

Here’s the smarter, more accurate, and way less saturated approach we use with Scrapeamax:

1. Scrape Companies Externally

Instead of filtering inside Apollo/Clay, we use top-level data sources:

  • Google Maps (for local)

  • BuiltWith (for tech stack filtering)

  • Clutch (for service companies)

  • Store Leads (for ecommerce)

  • Latka, AgencyVista, GoodFirms, etc.

You get companies nobody else is seeing.

2. Feed External Companies Into Apollo or Clay

Once we have clean company lists, we push them into:

  • Apollo to find work emails & contacts

  • Clay to enrich, filter, personalize

Why this works:

  • Apollo/Clay searches based on YOUR company list — not their own filters

  • You're getting people working in fresh, externally sourced companies

  • This bypasses saturation and hits way higher accuracy

Apollo and ZoomInfo Can’t Do This Alone

Here’s why:

  • Their filtering is locked inside their platform logic

  • You’re always pulling from the same pool as everyone else

  • You don’t own or control how company data is selected

With Scrapeamax:

  • You control the input (company source)

  • You use Clay/Apollo to enrich and contact — not to search

It’s outbound in reverse. And it works like hell.

Scrapeamax: The Bridge Between Raw Data and Scalable Outreach

Scrapeamax is not a contact finder. It’s a company scraping engine that fuels any enrichment tool you already use (Apollo, Clay, Smartlead, etc.).

  • Get hyper-specific companies

  • Scrape based on keywords, tech, niche, location

  • Push into Clay for outreach sequences or Apollo for contact scraping

All with zero saturation and 100% control.

TL;DR: Build Smarter Lists in 2025

❌ Don’t filter leads inside Apollo/ZoomInfo — they’re overused.
✅ Scrape company-level data externally first.
✅ Use Clay/Apollo to find contacts at those companies.
✅ Use Scrapeamax to feed this entire workflow.

This is how cold emailers in 2025 win — with better inputs, not louder outputs.

👉 Try Scrapeamax and build better lead lists today.